Extraordinary Claims

The U.S. Patent Office looks askance at claims for certain notorious inventions. Claims of anti-gravity engines and time machines automatically provoke skepticism.

In fact, claims like those provoke official skepticism. Under the law and regulations in the United States, the inventor must claim utility for the invention, and further must teach how to use the invention. Whenever a claimed invention appears to violate known scientific principles (for example, one that claims to yield more energy than it uses), the U. S. Patent Office may require demonstrative proof of the invention's usefulness and of its operability. In the particular case of claimed

Perpetual Motion Machines

the Patent Office usually requires, as a matter of general policy, that a working model accompany the patent application

Top of Page  


The Fine Print:
The information provided in this Web site summarizes some of the laws, regulations, and other considerations related to intellectual property. Neither the information you find here nor anything posted in the Internet should be taken in lieu of sound legal advice given within an attorney/client relationship.

Bohan Mathers & Associates, LLC, Portland, Maine
© 1997 Bohan Mathers. All rights reserved .